From the Park Slope Food Coop’s mission statement:
"We are committed to diversity and equality, opposing
discrimination in any form. We strive to make the Coop welcoming and accessible
to all while respecting the opinions, needs, and concerns of every member."
Stating this commitment is one thing; defining and applying
it fairly is another. The Coop's Membership Manual includes an Anti-Discrimination Policy "prohibiting any form of discrimination or harassment among members." The Coop will not tolerate discrimination against the classes listed in the NYC Human Rights law.
In 1964, the landmark Civil Rights Act became law. Title VII prohibits employment discrimination. Title VI prohibits
discrimination in programs and
activities receiving federal financial assistance. The Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (OCR) is tasked with assuring Title VI compliance at educational institutions receiving federal funds.
Although the Park Slope Food Coop membership is not bound
by Titles VI and VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, these guidelines provide
valuable standards for members’ behavior toward one another. The protections of
Title VII, which apply to the paid staff, should also govern interactions
between staff and members and among the members themselves.
The Coop is a communal membership organization. In addition to its role as a grocery store,
many members have viewed it as a venue for political advocacy, much like an
educational institution. In this context, Coop management can and should voluntarily
adopt the principles of Title VI, which protect students, to determine acceptable
member activities. In other words, Coop activities should align with the
expectations of the OCR, not
because of the risk of losing federal funding or lawsuit, but because it is the right
thing to do.
In January 2023, the OCR issued a Fact Sheet stating:
Title VI’s
protection from race, color, or national origin discrimination extends to
students who experience discrimination, including harassment, based on their
actual or perceived: (i) shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics; or (ii)
citizenship or residency in a country with a dominant religion or distinct
religious identity.
In 1994, the OCR determined that educational institutions receiving federal
aid have a responsibility to maintain a nondiscriminatory educational
environment, even if the administration is not directly responsible for all instances
of harassing conduct.
Anti-Zionism is Discrimination
Anti-Zionism constitutes a form of national-origin-based
discrimination. It seeks to delegitimize
Israel as a sovereign nation and deny the national identity and heritage of its
citizens. It aims to vilify and
discredit one nation and its citizens while promoting differential treatment of
Israelis and Israeli-Americans.
Moreover, anti-Zionism is a form of discrimination and
harassment rooted in targeting Jewish ethnicity. At its core, it denies Jewish peoplehood and
the historic connection of Jewish people to the Land of Israel, also known as
Palestine. Jews are told they are not
real Jews, but frauds and imposters who claim a shared national heritage.
Ever since October 7, 2023, the Park Slope Food Coop
administration - both the managerial paid staff and the elite committees - has
allowed promotion of anti-Zionism within the Coop. The group Members 4 Palestine (M4P) is
actively advocating for the Coop to join and endorse BDS. BDS is an anti-Zionist tactic to normalize
the call for the elimination of Israel as the sovereign nation-state of the
Jewish people.
There has been verbal harassment and threats made against
members opposing BDS. Jewish and Israeli members are being subjected to the
demonizing BDS lies that have incited multiple violent attacks on Jews and
property in Brooklyn, North America and Europe. BDS propaganda is shared during
open forum at the General Meetings and in the letters and members submissions
of the Linewaiters Gazette. The
management is engaged in finding a venue to host a large membership meeting to
consider endorsing the elimination of Israel.
For Jewish and Israeli members, the current environment at
PSFC is profoundly troubling. We are compelled to spend our valuable free time
countering falsehoods, defending our identities, and preparing to oppose this
measure if it is ever brought to a vote. This situation is making membership
increasingly untenable for us.
Anti-Zionism is Not Protected Speech
I believe the activities of M4P are being tolerated at the
Coop due to two fundamental misunderstandings:
- The
Nature of the BDS Movement: The BDS Movement is often misrepresented
as merely political advocacy for changes to Israel’s policies. In reality,
BDS is deeply intertwined with anti-Zionism and explicitly aims for the
elimination of Israel. Those who claim otherwise are either deliberately
misleading or have failed to thoroughly research the movement’s
objectives.
- The
Concept of Freedom of Speech: There seems to be a misconception
regarding what "freedom of speech" entails. While the government
is prohibited from limiting or penalizing speech, the Coop, as a private
institution, has the authority to establish and enforce a code of conduct
that regulates speech within its community. In fact, we already have such
codes, as outlined in the Linewaiters' Gazette guidelines and our
Membership Manual. Additionally, the Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC)
and the Equity Access and Community Committee (EACC) are tasked with
addressing breaches of this code.
What Can Be Done?
The DRC and EACC serve as the Coop’s official channels for
addressing complaints. Both committees have the authority to recommend
mediation between parties. Despite receiving and addressing numerous complaints
from both anti-Zionists and our side regarding specific incidents, the DRC has
declined to pursue further engagement or mandate mediation. When it comes to
our broader complaint about the creation of a hostile environment, the DRC
redirected us to the EACC.
Unfortunately, the EACC's leadership has demonstrated a
clear and vocal anti-Zionist bias. The current head of the EACC was among the
most prolific and outspoken anti-Zionist letter writers in the Linewaiters'
Gazette during our previous encounters with BDS advocacy. Historically, the
EACC has refused to consider complaints related to this issue, leaving us
with no confidence in its ability or willingness to address the civil rights
concerns of Jewish and Israeli Coop members.
The Coop's management—comprising the paid staff, Agenda
Committee, Chair Committee, and Gazette Committee—bears responsibility for
fostering the environment within the Coop. Unless they can present a compelling
argument that anti-Zionism does NOT constitute harassment, there should be an
immediate moratorium on the following: BDS-related speech at General Meetings
and in the Gazette, the inclusion of BDS-related agenda items, and
efforts to secure a larger meeting space for such discussions.
Dialog is the Answer
From the very beginning of M4P’s anti-Zionist activities at
the Coop, Coop 4 Unity has consistently extended invitations to M4P to meet and
discuss shared goals. These overtures have been met with silence; not one has
been acknowledged.
I sincerely hope that dialogue between M4P and Coop 4 Unity
can become a reality. I believe M4P sees itself as advocating for Palestinian
rights and pursuing a just resolution to the conflict. It may be they are unaware of the broader implications of their support for BDS and its
intrinsic connection to anti-Zionism. At best, they are deeply misinformed; at
worst, they are knowingly propagating harmful disinformation. BDS does not
advance the cause of Palestinian development or peace—it perpetuates the
dominance of totalitarian, terrorist organizations and sustains cycles of
violence.
Ultimately, I envision both groups working towards a joint
statement that calls for the release of hostages, the disarmament and surrender
of Hamas, a commitment to deradicalization, and a shared effort to foster
coexistence. More than anything, I want the Coop to return to being the
enjoyable and productive community it once was, where mutual respect and
collaboration thrive.
I am indebted to the Mosaic Magazine essay How the Incoming Administration Can Restore Jewish Civil Rights by Tal Fortgang for the ideas in this post.
The underscores in the quoted material are mine.